Nationalist Movement (1917 - 1939)
- After the end of the war, there was a resurgence of nationalist activity in India and in many other colonies in Asia and Africa.
Nationalist Resurgence Now
Post-War Economic Hardships
- War ended, all sections of the Indian population were experiencing hardships on various fronts.
- Industry - increase in prices.
- Workers and Artisans - unemployment and bore the brunt of high prices.
- Peasantry - high taxation and poverty, lead to protest.
- Soldiers - abroad gave an idea of their experience to the rural folk, return to a country impoverished and had less liberty than before.
- Educated Urban Classes - Unemployment acute racism in the attitude of the British.
Expectations of Political Gains for Cooperation in the War
- After the war, there were high expectations of political gains from the British government
Nationalist Disillusionment with Imperialism Worldwide
- Promised them an era of democracy and self determination after the war.
- Imperialist powers had no intention of loosening their hold over the colonies, divide the colonies of the vanquished powers among themselves.
- Post-war period saw a resurgence of militant nationalist activity throughout Asia and Africa.
Impact of Russian Revolution (November 7, 1917)
- Soviet Union unilaterally renounced the Czarist imperialist rights in China and the rest of Asia, gave rights of self-determination to former Czarist colonies in Asia and gave equal status to the Asian nationalities within its borders.
Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms and Government of India Act, 1919
- Not prepared to part with or even share its power with the Indians.
- policy of ‘carrot and stick’
- carrot - Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
- Stick - Rowlatt Act.
Main Features
Provincial Government—Introduction of Dyarchy
Executive
- Two executive councillors and popular ministers was introduced.
- Reserved & Transferred subject.
- Reserved subjects - administered by the governor through his executive council of bureaucrats.
- Transferred subjects - administered by ministers nominated from among the elected members of the legislative council
- Ministers were to be responsible to the legislature, executive councillors were not to be responsible to the legislature.
- Failure of constitutional machinery in province, governor could take over the administration.
- Secretary of state & Governor general interfere in respect of reserved subjects, transferred interference was restricted.
Legislature
- Provincial legislative - 70% be elected.
- System of communal and class electorates.
- Women - right to vote.
- councils could initiate legislation but the governor’s assent was required. The governor could veto bills and issue ordinances.
- Legislative councils could reject the budget but the governor could restore.
- Legislators enjoyed freedom of speech.
Central Government - Still Without Responsible Government
Executive
- Governor-general was to be the chief executive authority
- Central and provincial list.
- viceroy’s executive council of eight, three were to be Indians.
- Governor-general retained full control over reserved subjects.
- Governor-general, cuts in grants, certify bills rejected & Issue Ordinance.
Legislature
- Bicameral arrangement
- Lower house or Central Legislative Assembly - tenure of 3 years
- Upper house or Council of State - tenure of 5 years
- legislators could ask questions and supplementaries, pass adjournment motions and vote a part of the budget, but 75% of the budget was still not votable.
Some Indians into important committees.
Secretary of State for India, paid out of the British exchequer.
Drawbacks
- Franchise was very limited.
- At Central, legislature had no control over the viceroy and his executive council.
- Division of subjects was not satisfactory at the centre.
- Allocation of seats for central legislature to the provinces was based on ‘importance’ of provinces.
- Division of subjects and parallel administration of two parts was irrational.
- provincial ministers had no control over finances and over the bureaucrats
Congress’s Reaction
- August 1918, special session at Bombay under Hasan Imam’s presidency.
- Reforms to be “disappointing” and “unsatisfactory” and demanded effective self-government instead.
- "Unworthy and disappointing - a sunless dawn" by Tilak.
- Annie Besant found them "unworthy of England to offer and India to accept"
Comments
Post a Comment