Cripps Mission
- Proposals to seek Indian support for the war.
- Stafford Cripps, left-wing Labourite, actively supported the Indian national movement.
Why Cripps Mission was Sent
- Japanese threat to invade India
- Pressure on Britain from the Allies (USA, USSR, China) to seek Indian cooperation.
- Indian nationalists had agreed to support the Allied cause if substantial power was transferred immediately and complete independence given after the war.
Main Proposals
- Dominion status, free to decide its relations with the Commonwealth & free to participate in the United Nations and other international bodies.
- After the end of the war, a constituent assembly would be convened to frame a new constitution, partly elected by the provincial assemblies & partly nominated by the princes.
- Two conditions
- Any province not willing to join the Union could have a separate constitution and form a separate Union.
- new constitution making body and the British government would negotiate a treaty to effect the transfer of power and to safeguard racial and religious minorities.
- Defence of India would remain in British hands and the governor-general’s powers would remain intact.
Departures from the Past and Implications
- Making of the constitution was to be solely in Indian hands now.
- Plan was provided for the constituent assembly.
- Option was available to any province to have a separate constitution - blueprint for India’s partition.
- Free India could withdraw from the Commonwealth.
- Indians were allowed a large share in the administration in the interim period
Reason for Cripps Mission Failed
- Offer of dominion status instead of a provision for complete independence;
- Representation of the princely states by nominees and not by elected representatives.
- Right to provinces to secede as this went against the principle of national unity.
- Absence of any plan for immediate transfer of power and absence of any real share in defence, governor-general’s supremacy had been retained demand that the governor-general be only the constitutional head had not been accepted.
Muslim League
- Criticised idea of a single Indian Union.
- Not like the machinery for creation of a constituent assembly & procedure to decide on the accession.
- Proposals denied the Muslims - Right to self-determination & creation of Pakistan.
Other Groups
- Objected to "right to secede".
- Mahasabha criticised the basis of the right to secede.
- depressed classes thought that partition would leave them at the mercy of the caste Hindus.
- Sikhs objected that partition would take away Punjab from them.
- Procedure of accession was not well-defined.
- legislature by a 60 per cent majority, less than 60 per cent of members supported.
- Decision was to be taken by a plebiscite of adult males of that province by a simple majority.
- Scheme weighed against the Hindus in Punjab and Bengal if they wanted accession to the Indian Union.
- Talks broke down on the question of the viceroy’s veto.
- Gandhi describe, "post-dated cheque".
Comments
Post a Comment